Chief Justice of India (CJI) D.Y. Chandrachud emphasized the vital role of the district judiciary in upholding the rule of law, describing it as the backbone of the Indian judicial system. Speaking at a national conference on the district judiciary, the CJI highlighted the indispensable role that lower courts play in ensuring justice at the grassroots level and maintaining public confidence in the legal system.
The district judiciary is often the first point of contact for citizens seeking justice, and it is here that the majority of cases are initiated and decided. The CJI’s remarks underscore the importance of empowering district courts with the necessary resources and support to function effectively, recognizing that the strength of the judiciary as a whole depends on the efficiency and integrity of its foundational level.
Bombay High Court Imposes Rs 2 Lakh Fine for Frivolous Petition Against Uddhav Thackeray
In a related development, the Bombay High Court took a strong stand against the misuse of the judicial process, imposing a cost of Rs 2 lakh on a petitioner for filing a frivolous plea against Shiv Sena (UBT) chief Uddhav Thackeray. The court’s action serves as a stern warning against using the legal system for personal or political gain.
Mohan Chavan, a resident of Nanded and a doctor in philosophy, had filed a petition claiming that his religious sentiments were hurt when Thackeray did not apply the sacred ash (vibhuti) given to him by a priest during a public function. Chavan, who belongs to the Banjara community, argued that Thackeray’s action was disrespectful and sought legal redress.
Justice S.G. Mehare of the Aurangabad bench of the Bombay High Court, in his ruling on August 29, observed that the petition was devoid of merit and appeared to be filed with an ulterior motive. The judge noted that even a person with minimal legal knowledge would recognize this case as an abuse of the judicial process, intended more for gaining publicity than for seeking justice.
The court was unequivocal in its criticism, stating that such petitions damage the reputation of respected individuals and degrade the sanctity of the legal system. “Such petitions lower the image of respected members of society. Most of the time, petitions like these are filed with ulterior motives,” Justice Mehare said.
Recognizing the petition as a clear example of legal harassment, the court allowed Chavan to withdraw the plea but imposed a significant financial penalty to deter similar future actions. The Rs 2 lakh cost is to be paid directly to Uddhav Thackeray, with the court mandating that Chavan personally hand over the amount in the form of a demand draft to the former chief minister within three months. The court also warned of stringent action if the payment was not made within the stipulated time.
“The petitioner (Chavan) should purchase a DD (demand draft) in the name of the former chief minister Uddhav Balasaheb Thackeray, go personally to his home and deliver it to his hand or to the person whom he directs,” Justice Mehare ordered.
This ruling by the Bombay High Court not only highlights the judiciary’s commitment to preventing the abuse of legal processes but also reinforces the message that the courts will not tolerate actions that undermine the rule of law for personal or political gains. The decision serves as a reminder that the legal system must be respected and not exploited for frivolous or malicious purposes.