JK Rowling has openly challenged Scotland’s new hate crime law in a series of provocative social media posts, daring the authorities to arrest her if they believe she has broken the law. The Harry Potter author, who has long been a critic of certain aspects of transgender activism, used the platform X (formerly Twitter) to express her disagreement with the Hate Crime and Public Order (Scotland) Act 2021, which came into effect recently.
In her posts, Rowling described several transgender women, including convicted criminals and public figures, as men. She argued that freedom of speech and belief were under threat if people were no longer allowed to refer to biological sex. “It is impossible to accurately describe or tackle the reality of violence and sexual violence committed against women and girls… unless we are allowed to call a man a man,” she wrote.
Criticism of the Hate Crime Law
Scotland’s first minister, Humza Yousaf, previously stated that the new legislation was aimed at addressing a “rising tide of hatred” in society. The Hate Crime and Public Order (Scotland) Act 2021 creates a new offence of “stirring up hatred” in relation to various protected characteristics, including transgender identity, sexual orientation, age, disability, religion, and being intersex. However, the law does not yet include protections for women as a specific group, though the Scottish government has indicated that this will be addressed in a forthcoming misogyny law.
Rowling, who resides in Edinburgh, has often been outspoken about gender identity issues, aligning herself with feminist groups who argue that women’s rights and safety are compromised by certain aspects of transgender activism. In her latest posts, she referenced high-profile criminal cases involving transgender offenders, including Isla Bryson, a transgender woman convicted of rape, and Andrew Miller, who abducted and assaulted a girl. Rowling referred to them as men and suggested that describing them otherwise undermines women’s rights.
‘Freedom of Speech Under Threat’
Rowling’s central argument is that the new law could criminalize the accurate description of biological sex, which she views as essential for addressing issues like violence against women. “Freedom of speech and belief are at an end in Scotland if the accurate description of biological sex is deemed criminal,” she stated in one of her posts.
She went on to say, “Scottish lawmakers seem to have placed higher value on the feelings of men performing their idea of femaleness… than on the rights and freedoms of actual women and girls.” The author’s comments appear to challenge the Scottish government’s focus on protecting gender identity without what she sees as adequate attention to women’s rights.
More Read
Rowling’s Challenge to Authorities
In a bold conclusion to her online posts, Rowling, who is currently abroad, invited police action upon her return to Scotland if her statements were deemed illegal under the new hate crime law. “If what I’ve written here qualifies as an offence under the terms of the new act, I look forward to being arrested when I return to the birthplace of the Scottish Enlightenment,” she wrote.
As of now, Police Scotland has confirmed that they have not received any complaints regarding Rowling’s statements.
Reactions from UK Leaders
Prime Minister Rishi Sunak weighed in on the matter, supporting the idea that people should not be criminalized for stating “simple facts on biology.” His comments align with the views of many who see the new law as potentially overreaching in its scope.
Rowling’s ongoing stance on transgender issues has made her a controversial figure, with both supporters and critics voicing strong opinions on her views. Her challenge to the Scottish hate crime law has reignited debates over the balance between protecting vulnerable groups and safeguarding freedom of speech.
