Peter Navarro, a key trade adviser to President-elect Donald Trump, issued a strong warning on Thursday regarding China’s potential manipulation of its currency. Speaking to Reuters, Navarro emphasized that the incoming administration would not tolerate any efforts by China to devalue its currency, the yuan, amid reports suggesting such plans may be in consideration for 2025.
Navarro stated that while the Trump White House would not directly interfere with the Treasury Department’s biannual review of currency manipulation, the administration’s stance on the matter was unequivocal. “I don’t believe the Trump Treasury Department would welcome Chinese currency manipulation very fondly. The history of China as a currency manipulator is well-known,” he said.
Historical context of currency manipulation
The Trump administration previously labelled China a currency manipulator in 2019, marking the first time such a determination had been made since 1994. This symbolic move was significant, showcasing Trump’s willingness to take an aggressive stance on trade with the world’s second-largest economy. Although the designation was rescinded in 2020, it underscored the contentious trade relations between the two nations.
In 2019, China’s government permitted the yuan to depreciate against the dollar, triggering accusations that Beijing was seeking unfair trade advantages. Analysts noted that this strategy effectively made Chinese exports cheaper and more competitive in the global market, to the detriment of U.S. industries.
China’s currency strategy
Recent reports from Reuters indicate that Chinese policymakers are considering a similar devaluation of the yuan in 2025. This decision comes as they prepare for the possible reinstatement of higher U.S. trade tariffs under Trump’s presidency. Trump has pledged to impose a universal 10% tariff on all imports and a 60% tariff specifically targeting Chinese goods.
Allowing the yuan to weaken would provide China with greater economic stimulus to counteract the impact of these tariffs. However, such a move risks further inflaming trade tensions and could provoke additional punitive measures from the U.S.
Navarro’s perspective
Navarro, who served as an economic adviser during Trump’s first term, suggested that the president-elect could respond decisively to any perceived currency manipulation. “If China weakens its currency, (Trump) could choose to escalate tariffs even further,” Navarro stated. He also indicated that Trump might not wait for the formal Treasury report to act, potentially implementing higher tariffs preemptively.
This hawkish approach is consistent with Trump’s broader trade policy, which has prioritized reducing the U.S. trade deficit and protecting American manufacturing jobs.
Implications for U.S.-China relations
The prospect of escalating tariffs and renewed accusations of currency manipulation highlights the fragile state of U.S.-China relations. During Trump’s first term, the trade war between the two nations disrupted global supply chains and contributed to economic uncertainty.
Experts caution that a repeat of these policies could have significant ramifications, not only for bilateral trade but also for global markets. A weakened yuan would likely prompt fluctuations in currency markets, affecting multinational businesses and potentially leading to retaliatory measures by other countries.
Broader economic context
China’s contemplation of yuan devaluation also reflects broader economic challenges. As the country navigates post-pandemic recovery and increasing geopolitical pressures, policymakers are seeking ways to stimulate domestic growth and maintain export competitiveness.
More Read
On the U.S. side, Trump’s proposed tariff increases are part of a broader strategy to incentivize domestic production and reduce reliance on foreign imports. Critics argue, however, that such policies could lead to higher consumer prices and retaliatory measures that harm U.S. exporters.
Looking ahead
As Trump prepares to take office, his administration’s handling of China’s currency policies will likely serve as a bellwether for the broader trajectory of U.S.-China relations. Navarro’s remarks underscore the administration’s readiness to adopt a confrontational approach if necessary.
While the Treasury Department’s official currency manipulation review remains a formal mechanism, Trump’s history suggests that direct action—such as imposing tariffs—may be the preferred tool for addressing perceived economic imbalances.
As both nations brace for potential economic and political conflict, global markets will be closely watching for developments. Whether through diplomacy or renewed trade hostilities, the decisions made in the coming months will shape the future of one of the world’s most critical economic relationships.
