The road to Rawlins, Wyoming, like much of the state, is an endless ribbon cutting through rugged hills, fenced ranches, and wide-open plains. Known for its extremes—be it blizzards or drenching thunderstorms—Wyoming’s weather is as unpredictable as its landscapes are striking. This sparsely populated state has long been America’s coal mining capital, but in recent years, it’s been thrust into the forefront of the clean energy revolution.
The $5 billion Chokecherry and Sierra Madre wind farm project near Rawlins is poised to become the largest wind farm in the United States, with 600 towering turbines generating 3,000 megawatts of electricity. Yet, the clean energy it produces won’t power a single home in Wyoming. Instead, the electricity will travel 1,000 miles south, lighting up homes in California.
The shift from coal to wind has been hailed as a vital step in combating climate change. Wind energy already contributes 21% of Wyoming’s electricity generation, and projects like Chokecherry mark the state’s transition to renewable energy. However, this green revolution comes with its own set of challenges.
A double-edged sword
The wind farm spans 1,500 acres of cattle ranches and federal lands, avoiding residential areas. While locals in Rawlins appear relatively unbothered by its construction, environmentalists and biologists are raising red flags. Massive wind farms, they argue, threaten Wyoming’s unique biodiversity.
Transmission lines connecting the turbines to California’s grid will traverse prime wildlife habitats, including sage-grouse breeding grounds, mule deer migration corridors, and raptor nesting sites. Biologists like Mike Lockhart, a former U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) expert, warn that wind turbines often clash fatally with the very species conservationists aim to protect.
“Eagles, especially golden eagles, are being killed at rates far higher than people realize,” says Lockhart. He notes that Wyoming’s wind energy boom is progressing faster than environmental assessments can measure its impact.
Golden eagles, a Wyoming icon, are particularly vulnerable. The turbines’ spinning blades, each 165 feet long, often collide with raptors and migrating birds. As wind farms expand, experts like Teton Raptor Center’s Bryan Bedrosian worry that eagle populations, already under pressure, may decline further.
The price of progress
Wyoming’s wind energy development isn’t just a local concern; it’s part of a national push for clean energy. The Department of Energy predicts that wind will account for 35% of U.S. electricity by 2050. However, achieving this goal could come at a steep cost to wildlife. It’s estimated that by 2050, wind turbines could kill as many as five million birds annually.
The federal government has attempted to address the issue. In 2024, the FWS updated its Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act permitting process to reduce wind energy’s impact on raptors. Yet, the new regulations still allow eagle deaths as long as companies follow mitigation plans. Critics argue that these measures don’t go far enough.
“Balancing the climate crisis with the biodiversity crisis is critical,” says Erik Molvar of the Western Watersheds Project. “Focusing solely on reducing emissions without protecting wildlife habitats could create new problems as we solve old ones.”
The winds of change
Wyoming’s green transition reflects broader tensions in America’s energy landscape. On one hand, the move away from coal is an undeniable win for the climate. On the other, the rapid rollout of renewable projects often leaves local ecosystems as collateral damage.
More Read
The Chokecherry project’s transmission line, the TransWest Express, exemplifies this dilemma. The 732-mile line will cross four states, cutting through rivers, forests, and scenic valleys. While it will supply solar and wind energy to parts of Arizona and Nevada in addition to California, its construction has drawn criticism for its potential to disrupt fragile habitats.
A delicate balance
The debate around Wyoming’s wind farms underscores a broader question: How do we transition to renewable energy without sacrificing the environment we aim to protect?
Conservationists advocate for more stringent oversight and innovative solutions, such as bird-safe turbine designs and stricter regulations. At the same time, the push for clean energy is a race against time as the planet faces the escalating impacts of climate change.
Rawlins, with its sprawling wind farm and quiet streets, serves as a microcosm of this global struggle. While its residents may not see immediate benefits from the energy revolution in their backyard, they are part of a broader story—one where the stakes are nothing less than the survival of both our planet and its wild inhabitants.
In the end, the question remains: Is it truly clean energy if it comes at the cost of nature’s most majestic creatures? Wyoming’s winds may hold the answer, but at what cost to its skies?
