Now that their shared adversary, the Democratic Party, has been vanquished, cracks may begin to show in the alliance between former President Donald Trump and billionaire Elon Musk. While their public camaraderie has been notable, their diverging interests may pose challenges to their relationship.
Trump’s final term: A lame duck president
From 20 January, Trump will assume office as a lame-duck president, constitutionally barred from seeking re-election. For Musk, and other influential figures in Trump’s orbit, the next four years offer an opportunity to shape policy, dismantle regulations, and curb what Musk has derisively termed the “entrenched and ever-growing bureaucracy.”
Musk’s ambitions, however, extend far beyond Trump’s final term. As co-chair of the newly created Department of Government Efficiency (Doge), Musk is well-positioned to push his agenda, which includes interplanetary travel, reversing a perceived “population collapse,” and revolutionising technology. His vision looks to 2028 and beyond, a horizon Trump cannot reach.
The struggle for the spotlight
A potential flashpoint lies in Trump’s unrelenting need for attention. At 78, Trump is determined to maintain his grip on the Republican Party and dominate American politics well after his presidency ends. Yet, whispers of Musk’s growing influence – with Democrats jestingly referring to him as “President Musk” – may prove intolerable for Trump.
Already, Trump has been forced to dismiss claims that he has ceded power to Musk. Such perceptions, however exaggerated, threaten Trump’s status as the central figure in his movement, a position he will fiercely protect.
Policy clashes looming
While the two men are currently aligned, policy disputes could spark tensions. Musk’s defence of the H-1B visa scheme, crucial for attracting skilled workers to the U.S. tech industry, is at odds with Trump’s earlier promises to abolish the programme. Musk’s emphatic stance on X, where he vowed to wage an unrelenting campaign to preserve the visa system, underscores his commitment to the issue.
Although Trump sided with Musk on this occasion, the matter is likely to resurface during Republican debates on immigration policy, especially with Trump’s MAGA base largely opposed to the scheme.
Another potential rift involves U.S.-China relations. Tesla’s significant presence in China, including its first overseas factory, puts Musk in a precarious position should Trump’s “America First” faction advocate a hardline approach against Beijing. Such a policy could harm Tesla’s interests, forcing Musk to weigh his business priorities against political loyalty.
Pragmatism vs. sentimentality
The partnership between Trump and Musk is underpinned by mutual pragmatism rather than sentiment. Both men are adept at prioritising their goals and overlooking differences when necessary. For now, their shared interest in dismantling Democratic influence unites them.
However, reports of Trump’s irritation with Musk’s high-profile feuds suggest that tensions may already be simmering. Anonymous sources have hinted that Trump finds Musk’s penchant for drama “annoying,” a sentiment unlikely to dissipate if Musk’s prominence continues to rival Trump’s.
The inevitable divergence
The foundation of the Trump-Musk alliance is rooted in a mutual desire to defeat the Democrats, but their long-term visions diverge. Trump’s focus remains firmly on cementing his legacy and maintaining his influence within the Republican Party. In contrast, Musk is looking towards a future that transcends earthly politics, with aspirations spanning space exploration, technological innovation, and global markets.
Their alliance will endure only as long as it serves their respective interests. Once either party perceives diminishing returns, their relationship is likely to fracture. Musk’s policy priorities, especially those involving immigration and international trade, may well hasten that moment.
Conclusion
As 2024 unfolds, the Musk-Trump partnership will be tested by competing ambitions and ideological differences. While their mutual pragmatism has thus far sustained their alliance, the coming months and years will reveal whether it can withstand the inevitable conflicts that arise when two colossal egos with diverging goals vie for dominance. The bromance may endure for now, but its long-term survival is far from guaranteed.