Disgraced MP Mike Amesbury is facing mounting calls to resign from the House of Commons after being sentenced to 10 weeks in prison for assaulting a man during a late-night altercation.
The former Labour MP, who has been sitting as an Independent since his arrest in October last year, was found guilty of attacking 45-year-old Paul Fellows in the early hours of 26 October. Chester Magistrates’ Court heard that Amesbury had been drinking before engaging in a confrontation at a taxi rank in Frodsham, Cheshire.
Courtroom drama and sentencing
As deputy senior district judge Tan Ikram delivered the sentence, Amesbury dropped his head and swallowed hard before being escorted from the courtroom by two dock officers. The judge made it clear that a custodial sentence was necessary as both punishment and deterrent.
CCTV footage showed Amesbury striking Mr Fellows in the head, knocking him to the ground, before pursuing him onto the road and landing at least five more punches. The footage also captured Amesbury shouting, “You won’t threaten your MP again, will you, you f***** soft lad?”*
Members of the public intervened to restrain him, with one bystander heard remarking, “You’ll never be an MP after tonight, mate.” Mr Fellows sustained minor injuries, including a head wound and a superficial graze to his elbow.
Defence and mitigation
Amesbury initially claimed he had acted in self-defence, stating that he felt “threatened” and “intimidated” by Mr Fellows. However, his lawyer, Richard Derby, acknowledged the severity of the offence while emphasising Amesbury’s “exemplary character” and long-standing public service.
Mr Derby told the court: “I have been in this game many decades, and I have never represented a person with such an exemplary character as I have today.”
Despite recognising Amesbury’s remorse and the impact on his six staff members, Judge Ikram ruled that a prison term was warranted.
“I have seen a single punch to the head cause fatal injuries in cases I have dealt with before. While I note the limited injuries here, this was an unprovoked attack,” the judge said.
He further noted that as an elected representative, Amesbury “could reasonably expect robust challenge from constituents and members of the public.”
Political fallout and calls for resignation
Amesbury, who was suspended from the Labour Party following his arrest, had already resigned from the party before sentencing. He remains the MP for Runcorn and Helsby, having won the seat in 2024 with a majority of 14,696 over Reform UK.
Labour moved quickly to distance itself from Amesbury, with a party spokesperson stating:
“The Labour Party took swift action following Mike Amesbury’s completely unacceptable actions. He is no longer a Labour MP or a member of the Labour Party. Local residents in Runcorn and Helsby deserve better representation, and we look forward to them electing a new Labour MP in the future.”
The Conservative Party and Reform UK joined calls for his immediate resignation.
Tory co-chairman Nigel Huddleston said:
“The residents of Runcorn and Helsby deserve an MP who is able to stand up for them in Parliament. Mike Amesbury should do the right thing and resign.”
Reform UK party chairman Zia Yusuf added:
“The great people of Runcorn deserve far better than waiting six weeks for a recall petition to take place.”
What happens next?
Amesbury’s prison sentence leaves him subject to the recall process, which would trigger a by-election if at least 10% of his constituents sign a recall petition. However, the recall mechanism will not commence until all legal avenues, including potential appeals, have been exhausted.
An initial application for bail, pending an appeal against his sentence, was denied. He has now been transferred to HMP Altcourse, a Category B prison in Liverpool. A further bail application is expected to be heard at the Crown Court later this week.
As long as he remains an MP, Amesbury will continue to receive his parliamentary salary, a fact that has drawn further criticism from opposition parties.
The case has added to wider concerns about the conduct of MPs and the processes in place to ensure accountability. With public trust in politicians already at a low ebb, Amesbury’s fate may serve as a test case for how Parliament handles serious misconduct by its members.
For now, the pressure on him to step down continues to mount, leaving Runcorn and Helsby constituents in limbo as they await the next steps in this unfolding political scandal.