A leading public health expert has urged the UK Government to introduce new legislation banning smoking in homes where children are present, arguing that such a move could bring about “real change” in protecting young people from second-hand smoke.
Professor Sean Semple, from the University of Stirling, has highlighted that while Scotland has led the way in banning smoking in enclosed public places, children remain vulnerable to the harmful effects of passive smoking in private homes.
Writing in the BMJ journal Tobacco Control, Prof Semple described the home as the “primary environment” where children are exposed to toxic tobacco smoke and warned that a “significant gap” in legislation is leaving them at risk of lifelong health problems.
A call for legislative action
Scotland became the first part of the UK to introduce a smoking ban in enclosed public spaces in March 2006, a move that was later replicated across the UK. However, no such ban exists for private homes, even when children are present.
Prof Semple argued that this is a major oversight, given that homes often contain higher concentrations of second-hand smoke than public areas due to smaller rooms and poor ventilation.
He explained:
“Despite 74 countries implementing comprehensive smoke-free policies in public spaces, this protection does not extend to homes – the primary environment where children are exposed.”
He added that legislative measures are necessary to close this gap and ensure that children are not forced to endure the long-term health consequences of passive smoking.
“A ban in the home could not only protect children’s health but also shift social norms around smoking indoors, much like the effect of existing smoking bans in cars carrying children.”
Prof Semple’s remarks come as the UK Government moves forward with its landmark Tobacco and Vapes Bill, which aims to ban the sale of tobacco to anyone born on or after 1 January 2009. However, he insisted that smoke-free homes must also be a priority in tobacco control strategies.
“We want to see a world where smoking in homes with children present is a thing of the past. This work is a vital step towards ensuring children globally have the right to grow up in clean and healthy living environments, free from the harmful effects of second-hand smoke.”
Health risks and public support for a ban
Health experts have long warned about the dangers of second-hand smoke, particularly for children. Exposure to tobacco smoke at home has been linked to:
- Respiratory infections
- Asthma exacerbations
- Impaired lung development
- Increased risk of ear infections and sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS)
According to recent polling, more than two-thirds (68%) of people in the UK support banning smoking in homes where children are present, indicating strong public backing for such a measure.
Sheila Duffy, chief executive of Action on Smoking and Health Scotland (ASH Scotland), said protecting children from second-hand smoke should be a top priority.
“Tobacco smoke is toxic and is especially harmful to children whose lungs are growing and developing.”
She added that extending smoke-free policies to homes and other areas frequently used by children would not only safeguard their health but also help prevent young people from taking up smoking or using e-cigarettes.
“The new Tobacco and Vapes Bill brings an opportunity for real change. Scotland will be able to debate how best to protect children from breathing harmful tobacco smoke and the air pollution from recreational nicotine products like vapes and heated products. Everyone should have the right to breathe clean air.”
Scottish government response
While Prof Semple’s proposal has sparked serious debate, the Scottish Government has confirmed that it is not currently considering a ban on smoking in homes where children are present. However, a spokesperson acknowledged the concerns raised in the report and said the issue would remain “under review.”
“We note the publication of this report. We are not currently considering extending smoke-free legislation to inside homes where children are present but will keep this under review.”
A step towards healthier homes?
The push for smoke-free homes has divided opinion, with some arguing that such a ban would be difficult to enforce and could be seen as an infringement on personal freedoms. However, public health campaigners insist that children’s rights to clean air and a safe environment must come first.
With overwhelming public support and growing scientific evidence of the harms caused by second-hand smoke in homes, the debate over stricter tobacco control laws is unlikely to fade anytime soon.