NEW DELHI — The Delhi High Court expressed strong dissatisfaction with the lack of respect for the law by municipal authorities and law enforcement on Friday, criticizing their failure to implement its orders effectively. This stern rebuke came during a hearing on a public interest litigation (PIL) concerning the tragic deaths of UPSC aspirants in Old Rajender Nagar.
The PIL sought the formation of a high-level committee to investigate the circumstances surrounding the deaths at a local coaching centre. The petitioner’s counsel raised serious concerns about the potential complicity of the Delhi Police in the incident, alleging that a police chowki might have been involved. This assertion added a layer of complexity to the already dire situation, prompting further scrutiny by the court.
During the proceedings, the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) was criticized for its inadequate response. The MCD lawyer admitted that action had been taken against various entities except for the Rau Coaching Centre, which was still considered part of the case property. This admission did little to alleviate the court’s concerns about the overall handling of the situation.
The court’s frustration was palpable as it addressed MCD Commissioner, stressing that the city’s hopes for justice and accountability rested heavily on their actions. The court demanded answers regarding whether desilting operations had been conducted, as part of the broader investigation into the incident. The Deputy Commissioner of Police (DCP) was also queried about whether the investigating officer had collected maps of the area’s water drains, which are essential for understanding the drainage issues in the locality. The DCP responded that a notice had been issued to MCD officials regarding the drainage concerns.
The court was further informed that the drainage system in the area where the tragedy occurred was virtually non-existent, with roads serving as makeshift drains. This revelation highlighted severe infrastructural deficiencies that may have contributed to the fatalities.
In its remarks, the High Court emphasized the importance of justice and fairness, stressing that it would be a grave injustice to penalize the innocent while allowing those truly responsible to evade accountability. The court also instructed the Delhi Police to provide a detailed and transparent account of the facts surrounding the case, stating that failure to do so would be unacceptable. The court’s language was pointed, likening the current state of affairs to a “brothers club” approach, where accountability and transparency are compromised.
Criticizing public authorities for their ineffectiveness, the High Court asserted, “The public authorities aren’t working these days.” This pointed critique underscored the court’s frustration with the lack of progress and effective action from those in positions of power. The court reiterated that no one, regardless of their status or position, is above the law, and emphasized the need for accountability at all levels.
Additionally, the High Court directed the Delhi Police to conduct the investigation in a scientific and unbiased manner, urging them to resist any external pressures that might influence their work. This directive was aimed at ensuring that the investigation remains impartial and that justice is served based on factual evidence.
The court’s strong words and directives reflect its commitment to upholding the rule of law and ensuring that the authorities involved are held accountable for their roles in the incident. The High Court’s involvement underscores the gravity of the situation and its determination to see justice done in the face of administrative failures and potential corruption. As the investigation progresses, all eyes will remain on the Delhi High Court to ensure that the promises of accountability and transparency are fulfilled.