Luigi Mangione, the man accused of murdering UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson, has requested access to a laptop in jail—strictly for legal purposes—as he prepares for his trial.
In a court filing made public late Monday, Mangione’s lawyers proposed that he be given a laptop configured solely to allow him to review thousands of pages of documents and hours of video evidence related to the case. His defence team argued that similar provisions have been granted to other federal detainees and that denying him access would hinder his ability to assist in his own defence.
Mangione, 26, is facing a rare New York state charge of murder as an act of terrorism following the December shooting of Thompson outside a Manhattan hotel. The 50-year-old CEO, a father of two, was killed just before UnitedHealthcare was set to hold an investor conference.
Prosecutors oppose laptop request
The Manhattan district attorney’s office, which is prosecuting Mangione, has not yet responded to the request for a laptop. However, prosecutors have reportedly raised concerns over the request, citing instances where witnesses have been threatened in connection with the case.
Mangione’s defence lawyer, Karen Friedman Agnifilo, strongly rejected these claims, stating in the court filing that no evidence connects her client to any such threats.
High-profile case with wide implications
The killing of Thompson sent shockwaves through corporate America, particularly in the health insurance industry, where some companies responded by switching to remote work and moving shareholder meetings online out of caution.
The case has also sparked divisive public reactions.
While some see Mangione as a cold-blooded murderer, others have sympathised with his alleged grievances. Prosecutors claim that Mangione’s writings and the words inscribed on bullets recovered from the crime scene suggest a deep hatred for health insurers and corporate America.
A segment of the public has even lionised Mangione, donating money to his defence fund and attending his court appearances in support. Meanwhile, elected officials and corporate leaders have condemned what they describe as ideological violence and vigilante justice.
Mangione’s legal battle continues
Mangione, a computer science graduate from an Ivy League university, comes from a wealthy Maryland real estate family. He has pleaded not guilty to the state murder charge and is also facing a federal case that could carry the death penalty. He has not yet entered a plea for the federal charges, nor for the state-level gun possession and other offences in Pennsylvania, where he was arrested days after Thompson’s killing.
More Read
His legal team argues that without a laptop, he is severely disadvantaged in reviewing evidence and preparing his defence.
Strict limitations on requested laptop
If granted, Mangione’s laptop would be heavily restricted, his lawyers assured in the court filing.
The device would not be able to connect to the internet, play video games, or stream entertainment content. Its sole function would be to allow Mangione to examine the 15,000+ pages of documents and thousands of hours of video footage that prosecutors have collected as evidence.
Currently, Mangione can only review this material during meetings with his legal team, but his lawyers argue that there aren’t enough visiting hours for him to adequately go through all the files and assist in his own defence.
What happens next?
The judge handling the case will now decide whether Mangione should be given the laptop or if he will have to rely solely on in-person legal consultations.
With a high-profile trial looming, the decision could significantly impact how Mangione and his defence team build their case. Meanwhile, public debate over the implications of his alleged motives, the state’s use of terrorism charges, and the broader issues surrounding corporate America and healthcare continues to unfold.
