MANILA, Philippines — Senator Raffy Tulfo is spearheading an initiative to abolish the travel tax for economy class passengers, citing constitutional rights and budgetary concerns. Tulfo, who chairs the Senate committee on public services, argues that imposing additional costs on economy travelers contravenes their right to travel.
The proposed bill, which Tulfo intends to file this week, aims to address what he sees as an unfair financial burden on those traveling on a tight budget. Tulfo emphasizes that the current system imposes a travel tax on economy class passengers while exempting those in first and business class from similar charges. “Passengers in first and business class will still pay the so-called luxury tax,” he explained.
The Senator’s proposal is grounded in the constitutional guarantee of the right to travel, as enshrined in Article III, Section 6 of the 1987 Constitution. This provision affirms that “the right to travel shall not be impaired, except in the interest of national security, public safety or health, as may be provided by law.” Tulfo argues that adding financial burdens to economy class passengers undermines this fundamental right, particularly when they are traveling on limited budgets.
Tulfo’s proposed measure seeks to repeal Presidential Decree 1183, issued in 1977, which established the travel tax. This decree imposes a tax on passengers departing the Philippines, intended to support national development efforts. However, Tulfo contends that the travel tax disproportionately affects those least able to afford it, exacerbating the financial strain on budget-conscious travelers.
Under the current system, certain groups are exempt from paying the travel tax. Overseas Filipino workers (OFWs), infants, and government officials traveling on official business are not required to pay this tax. However, Tulfo believes that this exemption does not go far enough in addressing the broader issue of economic fairness for all travelers.
More Read
The Senator’s push to remove the travel tax for economy class passengers comes in response to growing concerns about the accessibility and affordability of air travel for ordinary Filipinos. By eliminating this additional cost, Tulfo aims to make travel more accessible and equitable, particularly for those who are traveling for essential reasons or on a limited budget.
If the bill is enacted, it could have significant implications for the Philippine travel industry and the broader economy. Proponents argue that removing the travel tax would reduce the financial burden on travelers, potentially boosting domestic tourism and making international travel more accessible. However, critics may raise concerns about the potential impact on government revenue and how the loss of travel tax income might affect funding for national development projects.
The proposed bill reflects a growing recognition of the need to balance revenue generation with the rights and needs of ordinary citizens. As discussions around this bill unfold, stakeholders from various sectors, including the travel industry and government agencies, will likely weigh in on the potential benefits and challenges of eliminating the travel tax for economy class passengers.
In conclusion, Senator Raffy Tulfo’s proposal to remove the travel tax for economy class passengers represents a significant shift in the discourse around travel affordability and constitutional rights. By addressing what he views as an unjust financial burden on budget travelers, Tulfo aims to uphold the fundamental right to travel while promoting greater economic fairness and accessibility in the Philippines.
