Unions have raised serious concerns over the potential loss of up to 50,000 Civil Service jobs, warning that the cuts will severely impact vital public services. The warning comes after Chancellor Rachel Reeves confirmed Labour’s plan to slash Civil Service running costs by 15%, aiming to reduce its size following its expansion during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Mass job losses feared
Rachel Reeves stated that the government would target “back office functions, administrative and bureaucracy functions” in an effort to streamline spending. However, union leaders argue that such cuts will inevitably harm frontline services and those who rely on them.
Fran Heathcote, general secretary of the Public and Commercial Services Union (PCS), voiced strong opposition to the plans, warning of widespread disruption:
“The impact of making cuts will not only disadvantage our members but the public we serve and the services they rely on. We’ve heard this before under Gordon Brown when cuts were made to backroom staff, and the consequence of that was chaos.”
The FDA, a union representing senior civil servants, also warned of the scale of the planned reductions. General Secretary Dave Penman told ITV that a 10% cut in the Civil Service salary bill could translate into around 50,000 job losses.
“The Civil Service is about half a million staff. So that could be up to 50,000 staff who would go,” he said.
Mike Clancy, general secretary of the Prospect union, emphasised the critical role civil servants play in both frontline and administrative capacities.
“Public servants in both ‘back office’ and ‘front line’ roles will both be critical to delivering on the Government’s missions, and the Government must recognise that many civil servants are working in ‘front line’ roles.”
Government defends the cuts
Despite the concerns raised by unions, Ms Reeves remains steadfast in her position. She reiterated that the size of government “increased massively” during the pandemic but had not returned to pre-pandemic levels.
“We now need to make sure that we do realise those efficiency savings so we can invest in the priorities.”
She argued that modern technology and artificial intelligence could help make reductions in the Civil Service “more than possible” while maintaining service levels.
“People want to know we’re getting value for money. When people are paying more in tax, they want to know they are getting more in return,” she told the BBC’s Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg.
The Chancellor also confirmed that the cuts will be achieved by reducing administrative budgets across departments by 15%, a move expected to save the government £2.2 billion annually by 2029-30.
“We are, by the end of this Parliament, making a commitment that we will cut the costs of running government by 15%,” she said.
Concerns over economic impact
The announcement comes amid growing concerns over how Labour will balance the nation’s books. Ms Reeves has ruled out increasing taxes in her upcoming spring statement but remains under pressure to find savings elsewhere.
Economic forecasts have been less optimistic than previously expected. The Bank of England recently downgraded its growth projections for the year, and government borrowing surged past expectations in February, hitting £10.7 billion – £4.2 billion more than anticipated by the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR).
Ms Reeves acknowledged the financial challenges but maintained that cutting wasteful government spending was necessary.
“We can’t just carry on like we have been, spending on the same things that the previous government spent on,” she said.
Welfare overhaul sparks further debate
Alongside the job cuts, Labour has confirmed that an impact assessment for welfare reform will be published with the Chancellor’s spring statement. Experts estimate that around one million people in England and Wales could lose their disability benefits under the government’s new proposals. The reforms aim to save more than £5 billion annually by the end of the decade.
More Read
Ms Reeves defended the move, saying:
“The benefits bill is through the roof, and people are locked out of work. I want to change that and give more people the dignity and pride that comes from work through proper support to get there.”
However, Shadow Chancellor Mel Stride suggested the Conservative Party would have gone even further in reforming personal independence payments (PIP). He argued that a more targeted approach would provide claimants with direct support rather than financial assistance alone.
“What it means is that if you were on PIP, for example, and you had a mental health condition, a reformed PIP would quite possibly say, ‘Rather than giving you money every year, we will actually provide you with treatment that will help you, and help you, for example, get into work.’”
Unions vow to fight back
In response to the government’s plans, unions are preparing to push back against the job cuts and welfare reductions. PCS, FDA, and Prospect have all vowed to campaign against the reductions and are urging the government to reconsider the scale of the proposed changes.
Mr Penman warned that further cuts to an already stretched Civil Service could have dire consequences:
“After years of underfunding and repeated efficiency drives, there is no more fat to trim. These cuts will inevitably affect frontline services and the public who depend on them.”
With the Chancellor’s spring statement looming, tensions between the government and unions are expected to escalate further. The coming months will determine whether Labour can push through its cost-cutting agenda without triggering widespread industrial unrest and further strain on vital public services.
The Bafta TV awards will be broadcast on BBC One and iPlayer on Sunday, May 11.
