The much-anticipated Netflix film Maharaj, which marks the acting debut of Junaid Khan, son of Bollywood superstar Aamir Khan, has found itself at the center of a controversy that threatens its release. The film, which was scheduled to premiere on June 14, was temporarily halted by the Gujarat High Court after members of the Vaishnavite Pustimargi sect raised objections, alleging that the film misrepresents their religious beliefs. Today, a crucial decision regarding its release is expected, as a single-judge bench of Justice Sangeeta Vishen is likely to watch the movie and deliver a verdict.
Directed by Siddharth P Malhotra and produced by Aditya Chopra under Yash Raj Films, Maharaj is a historical drama based on the real-life 1862 Maharaj libel case, one of the most notable legal battles in Indian history. The case involved a confrontation between a social reformer and the powerful Vallabhacharya sect, raising issues about religious practices, press freedom, and the exploitation of devotees.
Maharaj libel case of 1862
The historical backdrop of Maharaj is rooted in the infamous 1862 Maharaj libel case. The case revolved around a fearless journalist and social reformer named Karsandas Mulji, who took on the Vallabhacharya sect by exposing alleged exploitation and corruption within its ranks. In his Gujarati weekly publication Satya Prakash, Mulji accused Jadunathji Maharaj, a revered spiritual leader of the sect, of exploiting female devotees under the guise of religious practices. These revelations sent shockwaves across the religious community and sparked a highly publicized court trial.
Jadunathji Maharaj responded by filing a defamation suit against Mulji, leading to a sensational trial that captivated the British-ruled India. The trial, presided over by British judges, ultimately ruled in favor of Mulji, dismissing the case against him. This verdict was a landmark victory for press freedom and signaled a growing public awareness of religious corruption and exploitation.
The 1862 Maharaj libel case not only vindicated Mulji but also heightened scrutiny on religious figures, sparking conversations about the need for transparency and accountability within religious institutions. Mulji earned the nickname “Indian Luther,” a reference to Martin Luther, for his efforts in challenging corrupt practices in religion. His courage in exposing the misdeeds of the powerful Vallabhacharya sect left a lasting legacy in India’s socio-religious landscape.
The controversy surrounding ‘Maharaj’
While Maharaj aims to revisit this historical chapter, its impending release has triggered widespread controversy. The film has been met with opposition, particularly from the Vaishnavite Pustimargi sect, whose members are devoted followers of Lord Krishna and uphold a deep reverence for their religious traditions. Their concerns lie in the portrayal of Jadunathji Maharaj and the religious practices followed by the sect, fearing that the film may distort the facts and misrepresent their beliefs.
Social media platforms became a battleground ahead of the film’s scheduled release, with hashtags like #BanNetflix and #BanMaharaj trending as users expressed outrage. A section of the online community voiced concerns that the film might hurt religious sentiments, with some even calling for a complete ban on its release.
In response to these concerns, members of the Pustimargi sect approached the Gujarat High Court, requesting an injunction to stop the film from being released. They argued that the film’s narrative could incite tensions and create misunderstandings about their religious practices. The court responded by temporarily halting the release, leading to today’s pivotal hearing.
More Read
What’s next for ‘Maharaj’?
As Justice Sangeeta Vishen is set to view the film and pass an order today, the fate of Maharaj hangs in the balance. The decision could determine whether the film will be allowed to release or if it will face further delays or potential edits. The controversy underscores the delicate balance between artistic freedom, historical representation, and the protection of religious sentiments in India.
For Junaid Khan, Maharaj represents a significant milestone, as he steps into the limelight with his debut performance in a film based on such a contentious historical event. However, the backlash surrounding the film has also drawn attention to the broader debate about freedom of expression in India, particularly when it comes to films that delve into sensitive religious or historical topics.
With the eyes of both the film industry and religious communities firmly fixed on today’s ruling, the outcome will likely have far-reaching implications, not just for Maharaj but for future films that seek to explore India’s complex socio-religious history. For now, all that remains is to await the court’s decision, which could either greenlight the release of the film or force further deliberations.
