Erik and Lyle Menendez, serving life without parole for the 1989 murders of their parents, could be one step closer to freedom, following a recent recommendation by Los Angeles County District Attorney George Gascón. Gascón has urged the court to discard the life-without-parole sentences for the Menendez brothers and to resentence them to 50 years to life, making them eligible for parole due to their age at the time of the crimes. However, this path to freedom is far from guaranteed and could take months, with several legal steps ahead, including judicial approval, a parole board decision, and potential intervention from California Governor Gavin Newsom.
The Menendez brothers, convicted in 1996 for killing their father, Jose Menendez, and mother, Kitty Menendez, were initially portrayed by prosecutors as ruthless killers motivated by the prospect of inheriting their parents’ multimillion-dollar estate. However, during the trial, the brothers claimed they acted in fear, stating that Jose Menendez had subjected Erik to years of sexual abuse, an allegation initially dismissed by the prosecution. The first trial ended in a hung jury, but they were ultimately convicted in a second trial, where much of the abuse evidence was excluded.
Over the years, the case has continued to spark debate, particularly as perspectives on trauma and abuse have evolved. Relatives of the Menendez brothers argue that, in today’s legal landscape, the evidence of abuse would have likely led to a different outcome. Anamaria Baralt, a niece of Jose Menendez, has supported the DA’s decision, stating that Lyle and Erik deserve a chance to heal from past trauma. Yet, not all family members support the DA’s decision. Kitty Menendez’s brother, Milton Andersen, has opposed the resentencing recommendation, emphasizing the brutality of the crime and arguing that justice was served with the original life sentence.
Despite some controversy, Gascón’s decision aligns with broader reforms that his office has pursued, aiming to reevaluate severe sentences under evolving views on crime and punishment. Since taking office, Gascón has recommended resentencing for roughly 300 incarcerated individuals, including those convicted of serious crimes like murder. However, this move has been criticized, especially by those who see it as politically motivated. Nathan Hochman, Gascón’s opponent in the upcoming DA election, has accused him of prioritizing high-profile cases for media attention and weakening public safety. Hochman specifically condemned the timing of the Menendez announcement as an attempt to garner support just before the election.
Legal experts remain skeptical about how quickly the process will unfold. Criminal law professor Laurie Levenson from Loyola Law School notes that the case is complicated by internal conflicts within the DA’s office, where some prosecutors have voiced disapproval of Gascón’s stance. She warned that the judge is unlikely to simply accept the DA’s recommendation without carefully examining the circumstances and dissent within the prosecution. Levenson added that Gascón’s approach — placing the final decision in the hands of the court and parole board — could delay the Menendez brothers’ release by months.
Mark Geragos, the brothers’ attorney, has expressed optimism, suggesting they could be free as early as Thanksgiving. However, with the parole process involving additional evaluations, that timeline may be overly hopeful. If the judge agrees to the resentencing, the parole board would need to assess whether the brothers are fit for release. Should the board recommend parole, Governor Newsom would have 150 days to review the decision, during which he could either uphold or reject their release.
The Menendez case has gained renewed attention, particularly after the recent release of the Netflix series Monsters: The Lyle and Erik Menendez Story and the Peacock docuseries Menendez + Menudo: Boys Betrayed. Both shows delve into the complex narrative of abuse and power, with new allegations surfacing against Jose Menendez. Roy Rossello, a former Menudo band member, has publicly accused Jose of abuse, stating that he was drugged and assaulted as a teenager while under RCA Records, a label Jose once led. This disturbing testimony has bolstered the Menendez brothers’ claims of their father’s abusive nature, which forms part of the petition for resentencing filed by Geragos last year.
As the case progresses, it highlights shifting societal views on trauma and rehabilitation, but it also underscores ongoing debates around justice and political motives in the criminal justice system. For the Menendez brothers, their journey to freedom remains uncertain, despite a new wave of public sympathy and support from prominent figures.