In a significant ruling with potential nationwide implications, a federal appeals court has invalidated a Mississippi law allowing mail-in ballots to be counted if received within five days after Election Day. The decision, delivered on Friday by a panel of three judges from the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, underscores the tension between state laws and federal statutes governing elections.
The lawsuit challenging the Mississippi law was initiated by the Republican National Committee (RNC) and the Mississippi Republican Party.
Federal Law and the Court’s Rationale
The court determined that Mississippi’s allowance conflicted with federal law, which designates a single “day for the election” across the United States. Writing for the court, Judge Andrew Oldham, a Trump appointee, stated that the law created ambiguity about when a ballot could be considered “cast.”
“The State’s problem is that it thinks a ballot can be ‘cast’ before it is received,” Oldham wrote. Highlighting the absurdity of such a notion, he posited hypotheticals in which voters could theoretically cast ballots by merely marking them and storing them in a drawer or posting photos online.
Oldham concluded that such interpretations were incompatible with the legal framework meant to ensure uniformity and clarity in elections.
The Impact of the Decision
The ruling directly affects Mississippi and Texas, the only states within the Fifth Circuit with similar laws. Texas currently allows mail-in ballots sent by Election Day to be counted if received by the following day.
While the Fifth Circuit’s decision applies only within its jurisdiction, the interpretation of federal law could influence courts across the country. If other federal courts adopt similar reasoning, or if the Supreme Court addresses the issue, the impact could extend nationwide.
“This decision reinforces the principle that elections should conclude on Election Day, ensuring clarity and integrity in the voting process,” the RNC declared in a press release, celebrating the outcome as a victory for election integrity.
Nevada and Other States in Focus
The Mississippi case also shines a spotlight on states like Nevada, a crucial swing state that permits ballots postmarked by Election Day to be counted if received within four days. Earlier this year, the RNC and Nevada Republican Party unsuccessfully attempted to overturn the state’s four-day ballot receipt window.
Unlike Mississippi, Nevada’s law survived a legal challenge in federal court, with a judge dismissing the lawsuit in July. Nevertheless, the Fifth Circuit’s decision may inspire renewed scrutiny of such provisions in other states, potentially leading to similar challenges.
Nevada’s position is not unique. Many states and Washington, D.C., have laws allowing post-Election Day receipt of mail-in ballots. However, uniformity in how these laws are interpreted remains a contentious issue.
Local Responses in Mississippi
Mississippi officials have expressed their commitment to adhering to the court’s decision.
“Our Circuit Clerk and Election Commissioners will follow the law, whether it be the legislature or the court that decides what that may be!” Tim C. Holleman, a lawyer representing state election officials, affirmed. “They are here to serve the public and ensure our elections run efficiently and lawfully.”
More Read
The ruling demands immediate adjustments to Mississippi’s election process, potentially requiring voters to plan their mail-in ballots well in advance to ensure timely delivery.
Broader Implications for Election Integrity
The Republican National Committee hailed the decision as a landmark victory for ensuring transparent and fair elections. “Voters deserve nothing less than a fair and transparent election which ends on November 5th,” the organisation stated, emphasising the importance of concluding electoral processes promptly.
Critics, however, argue that such rulings may disenfranchise voters who rely on postal services, particularly in rural areas or regions with slower mail delivery.
What Lies Ahead
With federal courts offering divergent interpretations of election laws, the issue of ballot receipt deadlines remains far from settled. A unified stance, possibly from the Supreme Court, may eventually be required to resolve the inconsistencies.
For now, the Fifth Circuit’s decision underscores the ongoing debate between election security and voter accessibility. As other states with similar laws come under scrutiny, the Mississippi ruling could serve as a precedent with far-reaching consequences for American democracy.
