Paris: Arshad Nadeem made history on August 8, 2024, at the Paris Olympics by clinching a gold medal in the javelin throw. His throw of 92.97 meters not only secured the top spot but also set a new Olympic record. Nadeem’s impressive performance outshone India’s Neeraj Chopra, who finished second with a throw of 89.45 meters.
Nadeem’s triumph was a moment of immense national pride for Pakistan, and the story was widely celebrated across various media platforms. However, an intriguing detail emerged from the coverage provided by Pakistan’s leading newspaper, Dawn.
On August 9, Dawn’s e-paper prominently featured Nadeem’s historic victory on its front page. While this was a commendable move, a closer inspection of the report revealed an unusual detail: the article was published “by special arrangement with Times of India.”
While media collaborations are not uncommon, this particular arrangement between a Pakistani news outlet and an Indian media house has sparked curiosity and amusement among readers. In the context of the complex relationship between India and Pakistan, the fact that a Pakistani publication relied on Indian assistance to report on a national hero’s achievement has drawn attention.
This situation raises several questions: Was there no correspondent from Dawn or other Pakistani media present at the event? Was Nadeem’s victory unforeseen, prompting a scramble for coverage? Given the significance of Nadeem’s win, one might expect a more direct and immediate report from a local journalist, capturing the moment from a distinctly Pakistani perspective.
More Read
The Indian media, on the other hand, has been actively covering the performances of its athletes throughout the Olympics. From the elation of Manu Bhaker’s triumph to the disappointment of Vinesh Phogat’s disqualification, Indian journalists have been on the ground, providing firsthand accounts of their athletes’ experiences.
The reliance on an Indian news source for Nadeem’s victory report highlights an interesting contrast. While there are no adversaries in the Olympic spirit, which promotes unity and sportsmanship, the peculiar reliance on international coverage for such a significant national event raises eyebrows. It underscores a broader issue of media representation and the challenges faced by local news outlets in covering international events.
However, it’s important to note that such collaborations between media houses are not inherently negative. They can offer a broader perspective and enhance the overall coverage of major events. Yet, the timing of this particular arrangement and the absence of local reporting raises questions about the preparedness and on-the-ground presence of Pakistani media.
In conclusion, while Arshad Nadeem’s Olympic gold is a remarkable achievement that has won admiration from fans around the world, the circumstances surrounding the coverage of his victory add an intriguing layer to the story. Congratulations to Arshad Nadeem for his extraordinary performance and for bringing pride to Pakistan. His success is a testament to the power of sport in bridging divides and uniting people across borders.
