For the past couple of years, technology giants like Facebook, now Meta, Google, Amazon, and Apple have been under heightened scrutiny over market dominance, business practices, and societal effects. The scrutiny has increased amidst rising concerns about antitrust violations, data privacy breaches, and the styling of competition from concerns among policymakers, regulators, and the general public. These ongoing investigations and proposed regulations are supposed to correct these messes and change the face of the digital economy. The prime issues that surround these tech giants have to do with their market power and possible anti-competitive behavior.
Companies like Google and Facebook are accused by critics of having used their dominance in search engines and social media, respectively, to suppress any form of competition and manipulate markets. For instance, Google is under accusation for giving favoritism to its services on the search results at the disadvantage of rival companies. These concerns have been followed by antitrust investigations in the US as well as in Europe. The Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission of the US have probed Google over its advertising business and Facebook’s proposed acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsApp. EU authorities have, on its part, slapped fines running into billions of euros on Google over its anti-competitive practices in business regarding search and Android.
Data privacy, given the drama of numerous data breaches and controversies relating to the collection, storage, and sharing of user data, is certainly another critical issue surrounding these tech giants. Companies like Facebook have been accused of mishandling their users’ data, thereby letting unauthorized third parties have access, which is a clear breach of the privacy of those users. This has stoked public outcry and regulatory scrutiny over calling for much stricter regulations on protecting data privacy.
In response, very stringent data privacy laws similar to the GDPR of the European Union and the CCPA of the United States have been enacted or are proposed by governments worldwide, all in a bid to return the control of personal information to the consumer and to make companies liable in times of breaches and misuses of personal data. To that, critics would add that dominance by these tech giants stifles innovation and choices for consumers in the first instance by creating barriers to entry. Too often, one finds it hard for a startup or small firm to match an established platform with access to such a large user base and resources to invest in research and development.
More Read
There is less incentive to innovate and a reduction in the options available to consumers within the marketplace. However, technology giants are continuously being charged with content moderation and freedom of expression. In this context, some social media sites, like Facebook and Twitter, have been under tight monitoring for misinformation, hate speech, and political content. It is strongly believed that companies act with bias and censor political and social organizations from different sides of the spectrum. Where Hispanic, the line separating the building of a safe online environment and the protection of free speech becomes one of the most debated questions under the praxis of platform regulation. The variety of reforms presented by policymakers and regulators is to curb tech giants’ power and to look out for some fair competition in the future when conducting a digital economy. The set of measures would reinforce antitrust laws, join forces in law implementation agencies, enhance data protection regulations, and also put forward rules regarding accountability in content moderation practices. They require that tech giants allow interoperability with smaller competitors’ platforms. These have resulted in different degrees of cooperation and resistance from the tech giants. Some have been open to working hand in hand with regulators and engaging in reforms, while others have warned of overreaches in regulation that will retard innovation and ultimately hurt economic growth.
The extent of this debate between regulation and innovation underlines the discussion among leading policymakers, industry heads, and civil society. The results of these regulatory initiatives will, therefore, have implications for the future of the digital economy and the role of technology in society. There is a thin line to tread between the need for innovation and competition on the one hand and concerns related to market power, data privacy, and content moderation on the other. The ultimate objective, many would think, should be to set such regulations that ensure a competitive and fair digital marketplace that will protect the interests of consumers and expedite technological growth.
