“It’s beautiful – it’s just transformative,” said Sir Sadiq Khan, as we might soon be calling the Mayor of London, if reports are correct.
He wasn’t speaking about the much-talked-about knighthood that is set to be conferred upon him, but rather about his heated gilet. “Oh my God – you press a button, and it just warms you up,” he explained last week at the unveiling of the new names for the London Overground. In high spirits, Khan looked quite content. However, just a day later, the news broke that he was to be included in the New Year’s Honours list, destined to be formally knighted – a revelation that had Londoners talking.
Khan appeared cheerful once again on Thursday night as he helped unveil the Trafalgar Square Christmas tree, likely knowing that the announcement was imminent. For many, the news was a “marmalade dropper” – so surprising that it would cause someone to drop their toast, marmalade side down, in disbelief.
The news quickly led to an online frenzy, with detractors voicing their opinions in the form of quick-fire criticism of the mayor. Yet, in the words of pop sensation Taylor Swift, “haters gonna hate.” Just like Swift, Khan’s best response has always been to shake it off.
But amidst the debate, a more pressing question emerges: does he deserve this knighthood? While journalists are often hesitant to inflate a politician’s ego, the honest answer, one might argue, is yes.
Having known all three of London’s previous mayors, it’s clear that Khan stands apart in terms of his professionalism. Ken Livingstone, the visionary, had grand ideas for London, while Boris Johnson played the role of the entertainer, often bringing chaos to the political stage. Khan, by contrast, is undoubtedly the most conscientious. He prepares thoroughly for every meeting, delivers his speeches with precision, and has earned respect for his hardworking nature.
As a mayor, Khan shows tremendous dedication, always immaculate in appearance – polished shoes, perfectly suited, with even his now silver hair neatly combed. His background as a “working-class boy” who has become a “middle-class man” reflects a positive narrative of social mobility. Moreover, as a representative of London’s multicultural landscape, he serves as an admirable ambassador for the city.
For those who question his credentials, the counter-question is simple: who else would do a better job? And why haven’t they come forward to seek public office?
However, Khan’s time in office has not been without criticism. His handling of the Crossrail project, which ran over budget by £4bn and opened three and a half years late, is one of the major blemishes on his tenure. Similarly, his oversight of the Metropolitan Police, which has struggled with numerous scandals under his watch, has raised valid concerns. Additionally, the progress on affordable housing in London has been disappointing, and there have been struggles to alleviate traffic congestion, even as the city’s bus service lags behind expectations.
Yet Khan has also achieved significant victories. He has successfully expanded the Ultra-Low Emission Zone (ULEZ), contributing to better air quality, though there are ongoing debates over the cost-effectiveness of the Greater London expansion. He wisely refrained from cutting Transport for London services during the pandemic, helping to keep the city moving in difficult times. Furthermore, his decision to provide free school meals to all primary school pupils in London, regardless of their background, has proven to be a remarkable and compassionate initiative, going above and beyond his responsibilities as mayor.
What do Londoners think of him? A quick survey of local parents waiting at after-school football sessions in east London reveals a surprising amount of goodwill. “I like Sadiq,” says one mum. “I do too,” adds another. Many feel the same, though you won’t find them publicly airing their views on social media.
One of Khan’s most impressive feats is his record-breaking success in mayoral elections. He holds the record for the largest margin of victory in 2016 and the second-largest in 2023 when he was re-elected for a third term. This is a testament to his enduring popularity, as he has earned the trust of over a million Londoners.
Despite the personal toll of a politically charged career, including constant security concerns, Khan has remained steadfast in his role. While his occasional confrontations, especially with the London Assembly, have added some colour to his political style, his achievements cannot be overlooked.
The honours system should not simply reward political failure, but instead, elevate those who have served their communities well. Khan’s forthcoming knighthood is not only a personal triumph but also a reflection of the growing respect for London’s mayoral office.
So, as we approach the festive season, it’s not just the warmth of his heated gilet that has Khan glowing – it’s his steadfast leadership and dedication to the people of London. If the title ‘Sir’ is indeed his to bear, it will be a deserved recognition of his continued service to the capital.