Reasons Behind the Boycott
The decision to boycott the Governor’s reception is rooted in widespread dissatisfaction among DMK allies regarding Governor Ravi’s actions during his tenure. Leaders of these parties have expressed strong disapproval of what they perceive as the Governor’s misuse of his office and undemocratic behavior, which they argue undermines the federal principles that are central to India’s governance.
Tamil Nadu Congress Committee (TNCC) President K. Selvaperunthagai was vocal in his criticism, stating that Governor Ravi’s term officially ended on July 31 and that there is a widespread sentiment among the people of Tamil Nadu against his reappointment. Selvaperunthagai accused the Governor of misusing his powers and acting in ways that are detrimental to the democratic fabric of the state. “To register the overall opposition to the present governor, TNCC is boycotting the ‘At Home’ reception hosted by the governor on August 15,” he declared in a statement.
CPM State Secretary K. Balakrishnan echoed these sentiments, alleging that Governor Ravi has repeatedly disrespected the federal structure of the country. Balakrishnan asserted that the Governor’s actions have insulted the office he holds, and therefore, attending his reception is out of the question. He emphasized that the Governor’s approach has been detrimental to the cooperative relationship that should exist between the state and central governments.
CPI State Secretary R. Mutharasan was similarly critical, accusing Governor Ravi of running a “parallel government” in Tamil Nadu, in opposition to the democratically elected state government. Mutharasan claimed that the Governor has been functioning as an agent of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), a charge that resonates with the broader political narrative in the state, where the BJP is often viewed with suspicion by regional parties. “To condemn the ‘undemocratic’ acts of the governor, the CPI is boycotting the ‘At Home’ hosted by the governor,” Mutharasan added.
More Read
VCK President Thol. Thirumavalavan also announced his party’s decision to boycott the event, citing the Governor’s “anti-Tamil Nadu activities.” He accused Ravi of acting against the interests of the state and its people, which, according to Thirumavalavan, warrants a strong political response in the form of a boycott.
MMK President M.H. Jawahirullah joined the chorus of dissent, arguing that the Governor’s continued presence in office after the completion of his term is against democratic norms. He stated that his party would not participate in the reception as a mark of protest against what they see as a violation of democratic principles by the Governor.
Political Implications
This coordinated boycott by DMK allies is indicative of the deepening political divide between the state government and the Governor’s office. The ongoing tensions have fueled a broader debate about the role of Governors in Indian states, particularly in opposition-ruled states where the Governor is often seen as an extension of the central government’s influence.
The stance of the principal opposition party in Tamil Nadu, the All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (AIADMK), on this matter is still unclear. However, leaders from the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), Pattali Makkal Katchi (PMK), and Tamil Maanila Congress (TMC) are expected to attend the Governor’s reception, further highlighting the political fault lines in the state.
The decision by these key political players to boycott the “At Home” reception is likely to escalate tensions and could have significant ramifications for state-central relations. As the situation develops, the political landscape in Tamil Nadu may become even more polarized, with the Governor’s role continuing to be a flashpoint in the ongoing power struggle between the state government and the central authority.
