Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has sparked widespread outrage and condemnation after declaring that the catastrophic events of October 7, which left hundreds dead and wounded, will not be subject to a state commission of inquiry. His remarks come amidst mounting public demand for an independent investigation into the failures that allowed such a tragedy to unfold.
The October 7 attack, perpetrated by Hamas militants, shook Israel to its core. Armed gunmen breached Israeli defences, killing over 1,400 people and abducting dozens. The failure of intelligence services and the apparent unpreparedness of the military have raised serious questions about the government’s ability to protect its citizens. Many families, along with opposition leaders and public figures, have demanded answers, calling for a state commission of inquiry to investigate the lapses.
However, Netanyahu appears determined to block such a probe. “No state commission of inquiry will be formed,” he reportedly told close allies in private discussions, a statement that was later echoed publicly. Netanyahu defended his stance by claiming that such investigations are politicised and would distract from ongoing efforts to ensure national security.
Public backlash and calls for accountability
Netanyahu’s decision has intensified criticism from both opposition leaders and citizens. Protestors gathered in cities across the country, carrying signs with slogans such as “No Justice, No Security” and “Netanyahu Must Go”.
Opposition leader Yair Lapid condemned Netanyahu’s refusal, saying, “This is a betrayal of the Israeli people. Accountability is a cornerstone of democracy. Netanyahu’s fear of the truth is an affront to the victims and their families.”
Military and intelligence veterans have also spoken out. Retired Major General Amos Gilad said, “The people of Israel deserve answers. Without a thorough investigation, we cannot learn from our mistakes or prevent future tragedies.”
Netanyahu’s fear of the truth
Critics argue that Netanyahu’s refusal stems from fear of the potential findings of a commission. A state inquiry could reveal failures at the highest levels of government, including within his own administration. Questions about whether budget cuts, political decisions, or intelligence missteps left the country vulnerable to the October 7 attack loom large.
Some insiders suggest that Netanyahu is concerned about the personal political fallout. His coalition, already fragile and under constant pressure, could face a significant blow if the inquiry assigns blame to key figures within his government.
Analysts have noted that Netanyahu’s strategy aligns with his long-standing approach of deflecting responsibility and shifting blame. During the attack’s immediate aftermath, he pointed fingers at military and intelligence officials, a move that sparked further backlash for its insensitivity and lack of leadership.
Demand for justice remains strong
Despite Netanyahu’s stance, the push for an investigation is unlikely to dissipate. Public trust in the government has been eroded, with polls showing a majority of Israelis demanding a full and independent inquiry.
Legal experts argue that Netanyahu cannot indefinitely block the establishment of a state commission of inquiry. Under Israeli law, the Supreme Court could potentially intervene if it determines that the government’s refusal undermines public interest.
More Read
Meanwhile, victims’ families have vowed to continue their fight for accountability. “Our loved ones were taken from us because of failures at every level,” said Yael Levi, who lost her brother in the attack. “We deserve to know what went wrong, and we will not stop until we get answers.”
International repercussions
Netanyahu’s refusal has drawn criticism from international observers as well. Human rights organisations and foreign leaders have called for transparency and accountability, warning that failure to investigate could further isolate Israel on the global stage.
The United Nations has urged the Israeli government to conduct a thorough inquiry, with Secretary-General António Guterres stating, “Accountability is essential for justice and prevention of future atrocities.”
A test of democracy
Netanyahu’s decision not to investigate the failures of October 7 represents a critical moment for Israeli democracy. The public’s demand for transparency clashes with a leader determined to maintain control and avoid scrutiny.
As protests continue to swell and calls for justice grow louder, it remains to be seen whether Netanyahu can withstand the pressure or if public outrage will force his hand. One thing is clear: the victims and their families will not rest until the truth is uncovered.
