A family accused of falsely claiming Afghan nationality to gain asylum in the UK is now residing in a £575,000 luxury home in Hemel Hempstead. The quartet, identified as Gurbakhsh Singh, 72, his wife Ardet Kaur, 68, their son Guljeet Singh, 43, and daughter-in-law Kawaljeet Kaur, 37, appeared on bail at Croydon Magistrates Court earlier this month.
The Singh Kaur family allegedly claimed to be fleeing Taliban-controlled Afghanistan when they arrived at Heathrow Airport last December. However, they had reportedly been denied UK visas as Indian citizens twice earlier in the year.
The family’s current residence, a modern four-bedroom property, features an open-plan layout, a luxurious kitchen with premium appliances, plush carpeting, and a landscaped garden. With Hemel Hempstead’s outstanding schools and amenities nearby, the home epitomises comfort and convenience. The property, purchased for £467,000 in 2022, was listed for £575,000 in March 2023.
This living arrangement comes after the family had been housed at Wembley’s Holiday Inn, fully booked by the Home Office for asylum seekers. The cost of housing asylum seekers in the UK has risen sharply, with the Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR) reporting an increase from £17,000 per person annually in 2019/20 to £41,000 in 2023/24. Based on these figures, the Singh Kaurs’ accommodation expenses are estimated at £164,000 over the past year.
Legal proceedings
The family faces multiple charges under the Immigration and Asylum Act. These include allegations of:
- Seeking to enter the UK through deceptive means by falsely claiming Afghan nationality.
- Making false representations to request asylum despite previous declarations as Indian nationals in failed visa applications.
- Entering the UK without leave.
All four have pleaded not guilty and elected trial at Croydon Crown Court, where they are scheduled to appear on January 2, 2025.
Court proceedings revealed that the family required interpreters in both Dari and Punjabi during their initial hearing. Bail conditions stipulate that they remain at the Hemel Hempstead property until their trial.
Government response
The Home Office, when approached for comment, declined to discuss specifics of the ongoing investigation but assured that cases involving potential abuse of the asylum system are thoroughly examined, with appropriate action taken where necessary.
A spokesperson added, “It would be inappropriate to comment on an ongoing investigation. Where there are concerns of abuse of the asylum system, we ensure that these are thoroughly investigated.”
Broader implications
The case has reignited debates over the UK’s asylum policies and the financial burden on taxpayers. Critics argue that such cases highlight vulnerabilities in the system, while advocates emphasise the importance of due process and humane treatment for all asylum seekers.
The Singh Kaurs’ case, with its allegations of deception and substantial taxpayer costs, is likely to intensify scrutiny of the Home Office’s handling of asylum applications and its capacity to detect fraudulent claims.
As the trial date approaches, the case will remain under the spotlight, raising questions about the balance between compassion and accountability in the UK’s immigration system.